Home Blogs Practical strategies to engage caregivers in school climate surveys
Capturing information about students' perceptions of school climate and their mental and physical well-being can provide critical information about factors that influence students' experiences in school.
Some states, like Iowa and Kansas, recently passed laws that require schools to obtain permission from students’ caregivers before administering student surveys that cover sensitive topics, such as mental or physical health. These laws may pose a barrier to the use of school climate surveys and hinder educators’ ability to improve school conditions for equitable learning. In these situations, it is especially important for districts to communicate with caregivers about the value of surveys in supporting student well-being.
This blog post provides practical strategies for schools and districts to communicate about school climate surveys to caregivers. The strategies also may be useful to schools looking to broaden the impact of their efforts to improve school climate.
REL Midwest partners with school districts to build leaders’ capacity using data to reduce disparities among middle school students’ sense of belonging, disciplinary actions, and absenteeism—factors that contribute to student disengagement in schools.
School climate and youth development are two broad topics related to mental or physical health that many schools track over time. Since measuring aspects of these topics in some states now may require permission from caregivers, it is important for schools and districts to explain why school climate and youth development surveys are key tools for supporting student success. One vital point for schools and districts to share with caregivers is that student voice matters. It is not enough to know what educators think; it also is critically important to hear from students themselves. Students in grades 4 and higher are generally able to give meaningful answers to survey questions.1
School climate
School climate includes many aspects of a student’s educational experience. Schools with positive climates are safe; provide a supportive academic, disciplinary, and physical environment; and encourage respectful, trusting, and caring relationships throughout the school community.2 By measuring school climate, educators can identify needs, set goals, and track progress.3 Improvements in school climate can enhance the well-being and academic success of students, teachers’ job satisfaction, and overall school effectiveness.4
A sense of belonging or school connectedness is an additional aspect of school climate that can be useful to measure. School connectedness refers to a student’s feeling that adults and peers in school care about their learning and about them as individuals. This perception includes a sense of being supported and belonging at school. Student sense of belonging is linked to positive educational, behavioral, and health outcomes in adolescence and into adulthood.5 In 2021, 61.5 percent of U.S. high school students reported feeling connected to others at school, and this sense of connectedness was associated with more positive mental health, less substance use, fewer sexual health risks, and less experience of physical violence.6 Schools that take action to help students feel connected can improve student health and development.
Youth development
Measuring topics related to youth development is another way that districts and schools can support students’ mental and physical well-being. Youth development is a broad topic that includes how students grow academically, socially, and emotionally. It includes risk and protective factors that affect well-being, such as social skills; mental health (including suicide); bullying, violence, and unintentional injuries; sexual behaviors related to unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases; alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use; and obesity, dietary behaviors, and physical activity.7
Asking students to share information about their development helps schools better understand what is happening with students, where needs exist, and how to strengthen any programming to address issues. For example, in 2021, the U.S. surgeon general issued an advisory because youth mental health concerns, which had been increasing generally over the past decade, became worse during the pandemic.8 Ongoing monitoring of student well-being gives schools and communities the information they need to act to make conditions better.
A common misperception about the administration of these surveys is that asking about sensitive topics encourages the behaviors. However, there is no evidence that asking students about health behaviors will encourage them to try those behaviors.9 Studies indicate that asking young people about suicide, for example, actually makes it less likely that they will consider or attempt suicide.10,11
Schools have the opportunity to communicate with caregivers in many ways. Asking caregivers for permission for their student to participate in a survey is an opportunity for a positive connection between caregivers and schools. Caregivers are most likely to provide permission (for example, through completing an online form or returning a paper form) when there is effective communication and a strong sense that their child’s participation will have a positive effect on the school community.
One important message to convey is that a caregiver has a right to say “no” to their child’s participation in a survey. Any strategy designed to maximize caregiver permission and the return of permission forms should focus on whether a caregiver has registered their decision—not on whether that decision was a yes or no. Caregivers should never feel coerced into allowing their child to take part in a survey, no matter how valuable the survey may be.
Below are a variety of strategies that research and practice suggest may help promote the return of survey permission forms.12,13
Creating permission forms
Distributing and collecting permission forms
Monitoring permission forms and following up
Caregivers can be powerful allies in school improvement. Engaging with them to obtain permission for their children to participate in surveys should be part of a broader effort to communicate what the school is doing to support students and why.
References
1 Borgers, N., de Leeuw, E., & Hox, J. (2000). Children as respondents in survey research: Cognitive development and response quality. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 66(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910630006600106
2 U.S. Department of Education. (2019). Parent and educator guide to school climate resources. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/essaguidetoschoolclimate041019.pdf
3 Bryk, A. S. (2020). Improvement in action: Advancing quality in America's schools. Harvard Education Press.
4 Osher, D., Kidron, Y., DeCandia, C. J., Kendziora, K., & Weissberg, R. P. (2016). Interventions to promote safe and supportive school climate. In K. R. Wentzel & G. B. Ramani (Eds.). Handbook of Social Influences in School Contexts (pp. 384–404). Routledge.
5 Rose, I. D., Lesesne, C., Sun, J., Johns, M., Zhang, X., & Hertz, M. F. (2022). The relationship of school connectedness to adolescents' engagement in co-occurring health risks: A meta-analytic review. Journal of School Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405221096802
6 Wilkins, N. J., Krause, K. H., Verlenden, J. V., Szucs, L. E., Ussery, E. N., Allen, C. T., Stinson, J., Michael, S. L., & Ethier, K. A. (2023). School connectedness and risk behaviors and experiences among high school students — Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2021. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Supplement, 72(Suppl-1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su7201a2
7 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS). [Website]. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/data/yrbs/index.htm
8 U.S. Surgeon General. (2021). Protecting youth mental health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s advisory. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-youth-mental-health-advisory.pdf
9 Briney, J. S., Brown, E. C., Kuklinski, M. R., Oesterle, S., Hawkins, J. D. (2017, December). Testing the question-behavior effect of self-administered surveys measuring youth drug use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(6), 743–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.06.026
10 Dazzi, T., Gribble, R., Wessely, S., Fear, N. T. (2014). Does asking about suicide and related behaviours induce suicidal ideation? What is the evidence? Psychological Medicine, 44(16), 3361–3363. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291714001299
11 Blades, C. A., Stritzke, W. C. K., Page, A. C., Brown, J. D. (2018). The benefits and risks of asking research participants about suicide: A meta-analysis of the impact of exposure to suicide-related content. Clinical Psychology Review, 64, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.001
12 Jones, K. C. (2020). Bridging the research gap: A toolkit on inclusive research and development practices. Chicago Council on Global Affairs. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep24850
13 Wolfenden, L., Kypri, K., Freund, M., & Hodder, R., (2009). Obtaining active parental consent for school-based research: A guide for researchers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 33(3), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00387.x
Author(s)
Katharyn Peterman
Kimberly Kendziora
Connect with REL Midwest